1,114 research outputs found

    A novel heteroditopic terpyridine-pincer ligand as building block for mono- and heterometallic Pd(II) and Ru(II) complexes

    Get PDF
    A palladium-catalyzed Stille coupling reaction was employed as a versatile method for the synthesis of a novel terpyridine-pincer (3, TPBr) bridging ligand, 4'-{4-BrC6H2(CH2NMe2)(2)-3,5}-2,2':6',2 ''-terpyridine. Mononuclear species [PdX(TP)] (X = Br, Cl), [Ru(TPBr)(tpy)](PF6)(2), and [Ru(TPBr)(2)](PF6)(2), synthesized by selective metalation of the NCNBr-pincer moiety or complexation of the terpyridine of the bifunctional ligand TPBr, were used as building blocks for the preparation of heterodi- and trimetallic complexes [Ru(TPPdCl)(tpy)](PF6)(2) (7) and [Ru(TPPdCl)(2)]-(PF6)(2) (8). The molecular structures in the solid state of [PdBr(TP)] (4a) and [Ru(TPBr)(2)](PF6)(2) (6) have been determined by single-crystal X-ray analysis. Electrochemical behavior and photophysical properties of the mono-and heterometallic complexes are described. All the above di- and trimetallic Ru complexes exhibit absorption bands attributable to (MLCT)-M-1 (Ru -> tpy) transitions. For the heteroleptic complexes, the transitions involving the unsubstituted tpy ligand are at a lower energy than the tpy moiety of the TPBr ligand. The absorption bands observed in the electronic spectra for TPBr and [PdCl(TP)] have been assigned with the aid of TD-DFT calculations. All complexes display weak emission both at room temperature and in a butyronitrile glass at 77 K. The considerable red shift of the emission maxima relative to the signal of the reference compound [Ru(tpy)(2)](2+) indicates stabilization of the luminescent (MLCT)-M-3 state. For the mono- and heterometallic complexes, electrochemical and spectroscopic studies (electronic absorption and emission spectra and luminescence lifetimes recorded at room temperature and 77 K in nitrile solvents), together with the information gained from IR spectroelectrochemical studies of the dimetallic complex [Ru(TPPdSCN)(tpy)](PF6)(2), are indicative of charge redistribution through the bridging ligand TPBr. The results are in line with a weak coupling between the {Ru(tpy)(2)} chromophoric unit and the (non)metalated NCN-pincer moiety

    Bonding and elementary steps in catalysis

    Get PDF

    Structural Investigation in Solution of a series of five-Coordinate Bisphosphinoaryl Ruthenium(II) Complexes

    Get PDF
    The structure of the ruthenium(II) complexes [RuCl{C6H2(CH2PPh2)2-2,6-R-4}(PPh3)] [R = H (1), Ph (2) or Br (3)] was investigated in solution using two-dimensional NMR techniques (1H-1H-, 13C-1H- and 31P-1H-correlation NMR spectroscopy and 1H NOESY). The 1H and 13C NMR spectra of the complexes 1-3 were similar and could be completely assigned. The results of the NOESY study indicated that these complexes have a distorted square-pyramidal geometry in solution as was established for the parent complex R = H in the solid state by an X-ray crystal structure determination. The strategies used for the interpretation of the 1H, 13C and 31P NMR spectra of these compounds and the resulting assignments form the basis for future in situ studies involving these complexes in catalytic processes. Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under http://www.wiley-vch.de/contents/jc_2005/2000/99478_s.pdf or from the author

    Rh-POP Pincer Xantphos Complexes for C-S and C-H Activation. Implications for Carbothiolation Catalysis

    No full text
    The neutral Rh­(I)–Xantphos complex [Rh­(κ<sup>3</sup>-<sub>P,O,P</sub>-Xantphos)­Cl]<sub><i>n</i></sub>, <b>4</b>, and cationic Rh­(III) [Rh­(κ<sup>3</sup>-<sub>P,O,P</sub>-Xantphos)­(H)<sub>2</sub>]­[BAr<sup>F</sup><sub>4</sub>], <b>2a</b>, and [Rh­(κ<sup>3</sup>-<sub>P,O,P</sub>-Xantphos-3,5-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>(CF<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>)­(H)<sub>2</sub>]­[BAr<sup>F</sup><sub>4</sub>], <b>2b</b>, are described [Ar<sup>F</sup> = 3,5-(CF<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>; Xantphos = 4,5-bis­(diphenylphosphino)-9,9-dimethylxanthene; Xantphos-3,5-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>(CF<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> = 9,9-dimethylxanthene-4,5-bis­(bis­(3,5-bis­(trifluoromethyl)­phenyl)­phosphine]. A solid-state structure of <b>2b</b> isolated from C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>5</sub>Cl solution shows a κ<sup>1</sup>-chlorobenzene adduct, [Rh­(κ<sup>3</sup>-<sub>P,O,P</sub>-Xantphos-3,5-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>(CF<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>)­(H)<sub>2</sub>(κ<sup>1</sup>-ClC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>5</sub>)]­[BAr<sup>F</sup><sub>4</sub>], <b>3</b>. Addition of H<sub>2</sub> to <b>4</b> affords, crystallographically characterized, [Rh­(κ<sup>3</sup>-<sub>P,O,P</sub>-Xantphos)­(H)<sub>2</sub>Cl], <b>5</b>. Addition of diphenyl acetylene to <b>2a</b> results in the formation of the C–H activated metallacyclopentadiene [Rh­(κ<sup>3</sup>-<sub>P,O,P</sub>-Xantphos)­(ClCH<sub>2</sub>Cl)­(σ,σ-(C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)­C­(H)CPh)]­[BAr<sup>F</sup><sub>4</sub>], <b>7</b>, a rare example of a crystallographically characterized Rh–dichloromethane complex, alongside the Rh­(I) complex <i>mer</i>-[Rh­(κ<sup>3</sup>-<sub>P,O,P</sub>-Xantphos)­(η<sup>2</sup>-PhCCPh)]­[BAr<sup>F</sup><sub>4</sub>], <b>6</b>. Halide abstraction from [Rh­(κ<sup>3</sup>-<sub>P,O,P</sub>-Xantphos)­Cl]<sub><i>n</i></sub> in the presence of diphenylacetylene affords <b>6</b> as the only product, which in the solid state shows that the alkyne binds perpendicular to the κ<sup>3</sup>-POP Xantphos ligand plane. This complex acts as a latent source of the [Rh­(κ<sup>3</sup>-<sub>P,O,P</sub>-Xantphos)]<sup>+</sup> fragment and facilitates <i>ortho</i>-directed C–S activation in a number of 2-arylsulfides to give <i>mer</i>-[Rh­(κ<sup>3</sup>-<sub>P,O,P</sub>-Xantphos)­(σ,κ<sup>1</sup>-Ar)­(SMe)]­[BAr<sup>F</sup><sub>4</sub>] (Ar = C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>COMe, <b>8</b>; C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>(CO)­OMe, <b>9</b>; C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>2</sub>, <b>10</b>; C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>CNCH<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>O, <b>11</b>; C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>4</sub>N, <b>12</b>). Similar C–S bond cleavage is observed with allyl sulfide, to give <i>fac</i>-[Rh­(κ<sup>3</sup>-<sub>P,O,P</sub>-Xantphos)­(η<sup>3</sup>-C<sub>3</sub>H<sub>5</sub>)­(SPh)]­[BAr<sup>F</sup><sub>4</sub>], <b>13</b>. These products of C–S activation have been crystallographically characterized. For <b>8</b> in situ monitoring of the reaction by NMR spectroscopy reveals the initial formation of <i>fac</i>-κ<sup>3</sup>-<b>8</b>, which then proceeds to isomerize to the <i>mer</i>-isomer. With the <i>para</i>-ketone aryl sulfide, 4-SMeC <sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>COMe, C–H activation <i>ortho</i> to the ketone occurs to give <i>mer</i>-[Rh­(κ<sup>3</sup>-<sub>P,O,P</sub>-Xantphos)­(σ,κ<sup>1</sup>-4-(COMe)­C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>SMe)­(H)]­[BAr<sup>F</sup><sub>4</sub>], <b>14</b>. The temporal evolution of carbothiolation catalysis using <i>mer</i>-κ<sup>3</sup>-<b>8</b>, and phenyl acetylene and 2-(methylthio)­acetophenone substrates shows initial fast catalysis and then a considerably slower evolution of the product. We suggest that the initially formed <i>fac</i>-isomer of the C–S activation product is considerably more active than the <i>mer</i>-isomer (i.e., <i>mer</i>-<b>8</b>), the latter of which is formed rapidly by isomerization, and this accounts for the observed difference in rates. A likely mechanism is proposed based upon these data
    • …
    corecore